And that's why we're still stuck with high-beams and low-beams and no in-between-beams. And it looked like that process was grinding forward in 2018, when it was in the phase where manufacturers could weigh in with comments (Subaru pointed out that NHTSA referred to a "potion" of a test when it meant "portion," and we respect their attention to detail-slash-pettiness.) But, big surprise, no updated rule has been finalized. I found a pair of used Litronics, but my car did not come with Litronics. My Boxster needs new headlight assemblys, due to burnt lenses. Toyota has petitioned NHTSA to change the rule, allowing adaptive headlight systems. asked on Thu 1998 Electronics Prior Lake. But the rule remains in place for the simple reason that it's really hard to get everyone involved to agree on what should come next. History buffs will note that 1967 was a long time ago, and since then a few things have changed in the realm of vehicular forward-roadway illumination. And ol' FMVSS 108 set out rules that only defined high-beams and low-beams, because back then we didn't have Willy Wonka headlights that can go sideways, and slantways, and longways, and backways. 108, which has defined our headlights since 1967. The second behind the hazard warning lights switch - turn on the lights so you can get the screwdriver behind it and pry it off. So why can you get them in Munich but not Milwaukee? At issue is Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. Porsche's adaptive lights are clearly a major improvement over the simple high-beam or low-beam setup mandated for the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |